Search Swinburne Research Bank
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/151517
- Ethical concerns of nonclinical forensic witnesses and consultants
- Pfeifer, Jeffrey E.; Brigham, John C.
- Current research suggests that nonclinical forensic psychologists are appearing increasingly more often in the legal arena. We argue that many of the ethical dilemmas that face these psychologists differ from those encountered by clinical forensic psychologists. To test the accuracy of this assertion, 37 nonclinical forensic psychologists were surveyed to identify some of the ethical issues and dilemmas they have encountered while engaging in expert testimony or pretrial consulting. Respondents were asked also about how they have resolved these ethical issues and whether they were aware of the "Specialty Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists" (Committee on Ethical Guidelines for Forensic Psychologists, 1991). Results of the survey are discussed in terms of the need for additional regulatory guidelines or professional standards that speak directly to the ethical issues confronting nonclinical, forensic expert witnesses and consultants.
- Publication type
- Journal article
- Ethics and Behavior, Vol. 3, no. 3-4 (Sep 1993), pp. 329-343
- Publication year
- FOR Code(s)
- 1701 Psychology; 1702 Cognitive Sciences; 2203 Philosophy
- Clinical forensic psychologists; Ethical guidelines; Forensic experts; Forensic psychology; Nonclinical consultants; Nonclinical forensic psychologists; Psychological ethics; Testimony
- Publisher URL
- Copyright © 1993, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. The copyright policy of the publisher allows the accepted manuscript to be reproduced here after a publisher-enforced embargo period.
- Peer reviewed