A war about meaning: a case study of media contestation of the Australian anti-terror laws

Search Swinburne Research Bank

Home

List of Titles

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/190959

Download PDF (Accepted manuscript) (Adobe Acrobat PDF, -1 bytes)

Title: A war about meaning: a case study of media contestation of the Australian anti-terror laws
Author(s): Bossio, Diana
Abstract: Following the 9/11 attacks on the USA, the Howard government introduced extensive amendments to the criminal act within Australia. The Australian mainstream media has been criticized for its ineffective contestation of the controversial legislation, effectively becoming 'seduced' by the Howard government's discourses around post-9/11 insecurity. This article examines the representation of the 'anti-terror laws' by the Australian government and mainstream newspaper media. I argue that competing editorial practices in mainstream newspapers diluted the possibility of effective contestation of the laws. More broadly this article will illustrate that discourses around the media's traditional role as the 'fourth estate' often does not account for the various internal and external influences and constraints placed upon journalistic practice.
Publication type: Journal article
Research centre: Swinburne University of Technology
Source: Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, Vol. 25, no. 2 (Apr 2011), pp. 261-271
Publication year: 2011
FOR Code(s): 190301 Journalism Studies; 200104 Media Studies
Keyword(s): Anti-terror legislation; Australia; Fourth estate; Government; Journalism; Media discourses; News media; News reportage; Newspapers; Terrorism
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1030-4312
Publisher URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2011.553945
Full text
Peer reviewed