Search Swinburne Research Bank
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/2486
- Title
- Identification of categories and choices in activity diagrams
- Author(s)
- Chen, T. Y.; Poon, P. L.; Tang, S.; Tse, T.
- Abstract
- The choice relation framework (CHOC'LATE) provides a systematic skeleton for constructing test cases from specifications. An early stage of the framework is to identify a set of categories and choices from the specification, which is not a trivial task when this document is largely informal and complex. Despite the difficulty, the identification task is very important because the quality of the identified categories and choices will affect the comprehensiveness of the test cases and, hence, the chance of revealing software faults. This paper alleviates the problem by introducing a technique for identifying categories and choices from the activity diagrams in the specification. This technique also helps determine the relations between some pair of choices in the choice relation table - an essential step of CHOC'LATE for the subsequent generation of test cases.
- Publication type
- Conference paper
- Research centre
- Swinburne University of Technology. Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
- Source
- Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Quality Software, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 19-20 September 2005, pp. 55-63
- Publication year
- 2005
- Publisher
- IEEE Computer Society
- ISBN
- 0769524729
- Publisher URL
- http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2005.36
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2005 IEEE. Published version of the paper reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or to reuse any copyrighted component of this work in other works must be obtained from the IEEE.
- Full text

- Peer reviewed



