Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/226751

Download PDF (Published version) (Adobe Acrobat PDF, -1 bytes)

Title

Are they all the same? Benefit realisation from e-marketplaces

Author(s)

Stockdale, Rosemary;  Standing, Craig

Abstract

This paper addresses the issue of benefit realisation from e-marketplaces and examines whether there are significant differences in benefit recognition according to the type of e marketplace used. An empirical study of two marketplaces and one buying organisation is used to analyse how the realisation of benefits may vary according to different e marketplace models. A comparison is made between an intermediary and a consortium marketplace before the benefits achieved by the buying organisation are discussed. The study found that although there were distinct differences between the e-marketplaces, many benefits are achievable from both. Benefit realisation was influenced more by the buyer's procurement strategies than by the features offered.

Publication type

Conference paper

Source

Proceedings of the 15th Australian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2004), Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 01-03 December 2004

Publication year

2004

Keyword(s)

E-marketplaces;  Electronic marketplaces;  FreeMarkets;  Procurement;  Quadrem

Publisher

Association for Information Systems

Publisher URL

http://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2004/25/

Copyright

Copyright © Stockdale and Standing 2004. The authors assign to ACIS and educational and non-profit institutions a nonexclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to ACIS to publish this document in full in the Conference Papers and Proceedings. Those documents may be published on the World Wide Web, CD-ROM, in printed form, and on mirror sites on the World Wide Web. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors. The published version is reproduced in accordance with this policy.

Full text

Peer reviewed