Search Swinburne Research Bank
Home List of Titles Choices, choices: comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodology
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.3/227633
|Download PDF (Accepted manuscript) (Adobe Acrobat PDF, 220 KB)|
- Choices, choices: comparing between CHOC'LATE and the classification-tree methodology
- Poon, Pak-Lok; Chen, Tsong Yueh; Tse, T. H.
- Two popular specification-based test case generation methods are the choice relation framework and the classification-tree methodology. Both of them come with associated tools and have been used in different applications with success. Since both methods are based on the idea of partition testing, they are similar in many aspects. Because of their similarities, software testers often find it difficult to decide which method to be used in a given testing scenario. This paper aims to provide a solution by first contrasting the strengths and weaknesses of both methods, followed by suggesting practical selection guidelines to cater for different testing scenarios.
- Publication type
- Conference paper
- Research centre
- Swinburne University of Technology. Faculty of Information and Communication Technologies
- Lecture notes in computer science: Proceedings of the 17th Ada-Europe International Conference on Reliable Software Technologies (ADA-EUROPE 2012), Stockholm, Sweden, 11-15 June 2012 / Mats Brorsson and Luis Miguel Pinho (eds.), Vol. 7308, pp. 162-176
- Publication year
- FOR Code(s)
- 08 Information and Computing Sciences
- CHOC'LATE; Choice relation framework; Classification-tree methodology; Software testing
- 0302-9743 (series ISSN)
- 9783642305979, 3642305970
- Publisher URL
- Copyright © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012. The accepted manuscript of the paper is reproduced here in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. The definitive version of the publication is available at www.springer.com.
- Research Projects
- Full text
- Peer reviewed