http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Index ${session.getAttribute("locale")} 5 Game theory in financial markets litigation http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:10762 Wed 18 Mar 2015 20:31:12 EST ]]> Using game theory to optimize performance in a best-of-N set match http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:37452 Wed 18 Mar 2015 18:29:59 EST ]]> Game theory in financial markets litigation http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:10763 Wed 18 Mar 2015 18:28:44 EST ]]> Game theory for heterogeneous flow control http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:10257 Wed 18 Mar 2015 14:01:34 EST ]]> Collaborative learning in online study groups: an evolutionary game theory perspective http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:29308 Wed 18 Mar 2015 08:06:12 EST ]]> Applying risk theory to game theory http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:24311 0 without changing the information they convey. This paper describes risk-averse strategies where the linearity axiom may not hold. With connections to gambling theory, there is evidence to show why it can be optimal for the favorable player to adopt risk-averse strategies. This reasoning can then be applied to a two person zero-sum game arbitration process to determine an alternative outcome to the solution given by strategies under the Minimax Theorem. Risk analysis is used to show why the uncooperative solution in the Prisoner's Dilemma can be a 'reasonable' outcome to the game, even though the solution is non-Pareto optimal, and why cooperation may be implicitly forced in the game. Logical reasoning is given to show why maximin strategies in two person nonzero-sum games could be considered as a Nash Equilibria. A risk-averse status quo is devised for the Nash Arbitration scheme as an alternative to the maximin and threat status quo solutions. The analysis and results given in this paper show that it can be 'optimal' for the favorable player to accept less than the amount given by maximizing expectation, due to the risks involved and the possibility of having a negative payout.]]> Wed 18 Mar 2015 05:54:32 EST ]]> Game theory http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:7700 Wed 18 Mar 2015 05:44:19 EST ]]> Using game theory to optimize performance in a best-of-N set match http://researchbank.swinburne.edu.au/vital/access/manager/Repository/swin:24309 Wed 18 Mar 2015 02:04:08 EST ]]>